3 Job Search Mistakes That Are Killing Your Chances

3 Job Search Mistakes That Are Killing Your Chances Looking for a job can feel like throwing pasta at the wall to see what sticks. Conventional wisdom tells us to keep doing everything we can until something does stick. But is that actually helpful? Here are some common job search mistakes that you should  be careful to avoid  while you’re on a job hunt. 1.  You apply for jobs that you aren’t qualified forThere’s definitely an aspirational part of job hunting, especially if you’re looking to move up. That can be dangerous, though, if it means you’re applying for jobs where you know you don’t quite fit the experience level the company is seeking. On a basic level, it could mean that your resume gets skipped altogether. If your resume makes the cut and you make it to the next point (an interview of some kind), falling short in experience could get your hopes up for an inevitable disappointment when they go with someone who better fits the job description.Similarly, using phrases like †Å"fast learner† and â€Å"adapts to any new role† in your cover letter or resume may sound like a good way to spin if you’re reaching a bit, but you could just be setting yourself up for disappointment and an even longer hunt. . The reach-for-the-stars attitude is admirable, but it might not match up with reality.2.  You don’t network or grow your influenceBack in the old days, people would find out about job openings in the newspaper, send in a resume by mail (with a stamp, no less), and wait patiently to hear back. The internet has accelerated this process greatly, making it easier than ever to find and identify opportunities. But you know how else people found jobs in the old days? Good old-fashioned word of mouth and recommendations. That part isn’t as outdated as the snail mail application process.Job openings are still often filled by candidates who have an â€Å"in† somehow with the hiring company, and search engines just can’ t replicate that personal touch. So if you want to be the one with an in, you need to look for a better way into a company. Try to connect via LinkedIn- do you have any first- or second-degree contacts who work at your target company? If so, finagle that into an introduction and you can be the candidate with a personal introduction and a leg up.3. You’re too proactiveBeing proactive is great. Being proactive can show you’re a go-getter. However, being proactive does not mean constantly reaching out to the HR department for status updates once you’ve applied or interviewed. I know how frustrating it can be to wait and wait and wait and wait when you’re anxious to hear what’s going on. Pace your floor if you have to, but don’t reach out to HR unless it’s been more than a week of radio silence. For starters, HR might be in a holding pattern while the hiring manager sees all of the candidates or is simply too busy to wrap up the process. Whatever the reason, haunting HR once a day is not going to endear you to the people you’re hoping will hire you.If any of these sound familiar, you shouldn’t feel badly. We’re all guilty of these things at one time or another. Just know that they can slow down your job search and even hurt your chances for getting into the right position. So be patient, be realistic, and be sure that your efforts will pay off in the long run.

Comparing El Grecos St. Francis Venerating the Crucifix to El Grecos St. John the Baptist

Comparing El Grecos St. Francis Venerating the Crucifix to El Grecos St. John the Baptist Free Online Research Papers Comparing El Grecos St. Francis Venerating the Crucifix to El Grecos St. John the Baptist In both of his works of art, El Greco is working within a same format, a vertical rectangle. There is a difference in the scaling though. St. Francis Venerating the Crucifix is about four by eight feet in size, whereas St. John the Baptist is only about two and a half by four feet in size. Both pieces use oil on canvas as the medium. The compositions are alike not only because they are done by the same artist, but also in the same time period. In both of the paintings El Greco prefers the triangular and rectangular shapes to any other ones (the only round forms that he uses are the shapes of the Saints’ faces), and the triangular forms are dominant over the rectangular ones. In Saint Francis Venerating the Crucifix, the big slab of rock in the background forms a triangle in an upper right corner (from the viewer’s perspective,) The kneeling position of St. Francis and his cape form a right triangle, so does the crucifix leaning against the skull. The Christ’s body on the crucifix forms a number of triangles-first is formed by his legs being bent at the knees; second is formed by his body and a right arm, and yet another one is formed by his body and his left arm. The sides of the rock in front of which St. Francis is kneeling form rectangles, and the top of it, which is being used as a table, forms a triangle. Two triangles are also being formed by St. Francis’s hands being crossed on his chest. In St. John the Baptist the overall shape of St. John’s body is a vertical rectangle, but each one of his hands create a triangle with his body on each side. The top rock to the left of St. John (viewer’s perspective) also forms a triangle, and the rock directly below it forms a rectangle. The triangles are also formed by an overall arrangement of the clouds at the both sides of St. John. The top area and the sides where the sheep are placed form rectangles. The overall shape of the sheep itself forms another two triangles. In St. Francis Venerating the Crucifix, the neutral colors are heavily dominant over hues. There are almost no hues at all, except for the dark-yellowish color of his skull, which El Greco deliberately makes low in value so as to match the surroundings, and some very little blue of the small piece of the sky which is shown in an upper right corner. Overall, the picture is low in both intensity and value, with the main colors being gray (St. Francis’s robe), brown and dark brown (the surrounding rocks), and some black (shaded part of the rocks). The face of St. Francis and the Christ on the crucifix create a strong contrast in value with the rest of the objects shown in the picture. They are in comparison are much higher in value because they are the only objects in the picture upon which the light from the sky falls from the top corner. In St. John the Baptist, the artist uses a lot more hues. They are: blue (the sky in the background), green (the grassland behind St. John), and indigo/violet (the mountain in the background). The neutrals are only the brownish color of the earth upon which St. John is standing, gray rocks, and gray sheep. Overall, the colors in the picture, being high in value much higher in value in comparison to St. Francis, work together to create a much warmer look as opposed to the grim neutrals of St. Francis. Both pictures are low in intensity. The lighting used in both pictures is very different. In St. Francis Venerating the Crucifix, the light comes only from the top right corner, and falls only on St. Francis’s face and the crucifix, whereas in St. John the Baptist the light is diffused. There is no strong contrast between light and shadow in either picture, but it is much more obvious in St. Francis because his face being illuminated creates somewhat of a contrast with the shaded areas. In both works, the texture is the same. The actual texture, being old in age and being oil on canvas, is somewhat rough, although it looks smooth from a distance. The visual texture created by both works is also smooth. I chose to compare these two pieces for a fairly simple reason; faith in the Lord. In St. Francis Venerating the Cross, I noticed that on the bottom right corner there is a page from the Bible ripped out and looks like blood stains are on it. That stood out the most for me because the Bible is a sacred book and letter from God. Blood stains are not very positive and having the page on the ground is symbolic of evil. We are to have God on the most high and not let Him ever feel lesser than the greatest and most almighty. In St. John the Baptist, I noticed that he is very tall and the only light that is really showing is right over the city. St. John’s size is a symbol that he is one of God’s followers. Also, another point is that he is trying to show that Jesus loves everyone no matter who or what you are. The light shows that the Lord is looking out for His children that reside in that area. Overall, these two pieces are very admirable and show a faith in the Lord that is unconditional; just like His love for us. Research Papers on Comparing El Greco's St. Francis Venerating the Crucifix to El Greco's St. John the BaptistThe Hockey GameHip-Hop is ArtWhere Wild and West MeetThe Masque of the Red Death Room meaningsMarketing of Lifeboy Soap A Unilever ProductThe Spring and AutumnThe Project Managment Office System19 Century Society: A Deeply Divided EraBringing Democracy to AfricaMind Travel

Term paper that present the knowledge and depth you obtained in this Essay

Term paper that present the knowledge and depth you obtained in this class. The paper can be from any topic discussed or not in - Essay Example Definition Cushing’s Syndrome is a disorder involving the hormones and is particularly caused by an abnormal increase in the amount of the hormone cortisol or other glucocorticoid hormones in the blood (Nieman et al., 2008). In the case of an overactive immune system, glucocorticoids usually turn down the inflammation system as a sort of negative feedback mechanism. However, if there is too much production of glucocorticoids, especially cortisol, in the blood, then the entire immune system might be turned down, thus leading to a variety of numerous physiological disturbances known as Cushing’s syndrome (Nieman et al., 2008). Causes The main cause of Cushing’s syndrome is the overproduction of adenocorticotropic hormone, or ACTH, by the pituitary gland, which is usually known as Cushing’s Disease. Another cause is an adrenal gland tumor that usually occurs among women over 40 years of age. A third cause is a tumor somewhere in the body which either produces too much cortisol or causes its production, such as tumors in the pancreas, lungs or thyroid that oversecrete ACTH (Nieman et al., 2008). ... However, the most initial step for Cushing’s syndrome is the ACTH stimulating the adrenal glands for the production of cortisol (Blevins, 2002). Symptoms Cushing’s Syndrome is characterized by â€Å"reddish purple striae, plethora, proximal muscle weakness, bruising with no obvious trauma, as well as unexplained osteoporosis† (Nieman et al., 2008). Other symptoms of the disease include â€Å"obesity, depression, diabetes, hypertension, or menstrual irregularity† (Nieman et al., 2008). If Cushing’s Syndrome affects the higher brain centers in the case of complications, it may cause anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression, alcoholism and diabetes. Other more noticeable symptoms include obesity of the upper torso coupled with disproportionately thin limbs, a round and red face with characterized fullness, and acne or certain other skin infections. The less common symptoms include a buffalo hump, backache, tenderness and pain of the bones, rib and spine fractures, weak muscles, excessive hair growth in the woman, impotence and lack of sexual desire in men, and certain headache, tiredness and feelings of thirst and hunger (Nieman et al., 2008). Treatment The treatment of choice is surgical removal of the tumor. This should be followed by treatment with hydrocortisone or hydrocortisone replacement therapy because cortisol levels will go down fast once the tumor is removed. Moreover, in the case of patients with malignant adrenal cortical neoplasm, the treatment of choice must be open adrenalectomy (Thomson et al., 2010). Through an MRI scan, cases of mediastinal masses that intertwine with the heart nerves must be done with extreme care so as not to injure such a delicate organ. Moreover, CT-guided coaxial core biopsy to investigate whether it is

Migration Project Paper Research Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Migration Project - Research Paper Example It is difficult for Muslims to immigrate to America at present. Same way many of the gulf countries also started to control immigration in recent times because of the demographic imbalances it created in gulf countries. In short, migration is a controversial subject at present and that is why I decided to research more about this subject. Immigration is a difficult process now, especially to America. â€Å"Illegal immigration into the United States is massive in scale. More than 10 million undocumented aliens currently reside in the U.S., and that population is growing by 700,000 per year†(Kane & Johnson). Terrorism is causing big problems to America at present and therefore they are keen in reducing immigration as much as possible. This paper is written based on an interview I conducted with my own wife Amani Shami. I met her in 2009 at Saudi Arabia and married her in the same year. She is a student at Kent state university now. She came to America in 2010 after our marriage. Before coming to America, she has completed her graduation in Geography at the University of King Khalid, Saudi Arabia. As a new immigrant to America, I do believe that my wife can definitely help me to prepare this paper with respect to migration. Saudi Arabia, the country which Amani belongs is a periphery country. Countries can be classified as periphery, semi-periphery or core countries based on development, share of global wealth, strength of institutions, dependency on other countries etc. Even though Saudi Arabia is a rich country in the Middle East, it is periphery in nature when we compare it with America. Push and pull factors can affect immigration from one country to another. Land scarcity in home country, Political and/or religious persecution, Revolutions and Poverty are some of the push factors whereas Promise of freedom (religious and political), Hope for a new life, Industry Jobs, etc are some of the pull factors of immigration. In Amani’s case, Hope for a n ew life (Pull factor) forced her to migrate to America. It should be noted that America is the most developed and wealthiest country in the world and no other country offers the same freedom and liberties that America offers for human life. Apart from these factors, another factor which motivated Amani to migrate to America is the opportunity to live with her husband and complete her studies in America. The quality of education in America is comparatively higher than that in Saudi Arabia. Amani was actually failed to receive a job in Saudi Arabia because of stiff competition from others. It should be noted that majority of the Saudi youths are going abroad for getting quality education and when they return, companies often appoint them at the expense of domestically graduated students. Even though, Amani came to America as a student, the family reunion program helped her in a lot in visa processing. Even though she applied for green card first, the delay in processing green card app lications forced her to apply for a student visa. Getting a student visa in America is much easier than getting a green card now. Green card application processing may take 1 to 2 years whereas student visa processing may take less than 6 months in America. Amani faced little problems in entering America even though there are many complaints about the treatment of immigrants, especially Muslim immigrants at American airports. The authorities did not ask any confusing or

RULES OF EVIDENCE ADMISSIBILITY Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

RULES OF EVIDENCE ADMISSIBILITY - Research Paper Example Despite the gigantic evidence presented against the suspect, the defense attorney, Johnnie Cochran was able to convince the jurors that there was reasonable doubt that O.J Simpson had actually committed crimes against him (Schuetz and Lilley, 1999). The case is America’s most publicized. However, Cochran’s success did not rely mostly on evidence or lack of it but maximized on the trivial errors committed by both the prosecutors and the Los Angeles Police Department at the crime scene and the court room (Kaplan, 2009). The tampered gloves, inconsistencies in the blood sample handling and poor crime scene management are some of the most outstanding weaknesses that Chrochan capitalized on. It was only in a later civil ruling that Simpson was charged with the wrongful death of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman. The blunders committed during the homicide trials contributed immensely to the suspect’s acquittal. If the detectives and attorneys involved in the prosecution had been more careful, the case could probably have ended successfully, with a â€Å"Proof beyond Reasonable Doubt† that Simpson was actually responsible for the deaths (Kaplan, 2009). This paper will highlight the mistakes committed during the trials by the Los Angeles Police Department during the homicide trial and attorneys and lawyers should improve their investigative processes. For instance, the DNA samples brought in by the prosecution were highly questioned. It was evident that the blood samples had been tampered with due to constant movement and flow of custody, where he pointed one of the custodians as a medical student. Cochran accused the police officers concerned of incompetence in handling of evidence. From all evidence, it is quite evident that someone had tried to tamper with the blood samples despite the fact that they were in the custody of the policemen. In such a scenario, the blood samples could not provide accurate results. Again, the evidence collected from the crime scene was extremely dubitable. Ogle (†¦) states that there should be a clear order in a crime scene. In O.J Simpson’s case, it was evident that many people had entered the scene before the detective had arrived and that even after his arrival, he did not establish an order of who was allowed to enter (Hunt, 1994). He left and entered the scene several times, all this while leaving different people in charge. This on its part had more serious repercussions later on in the evidence collection. The large number of people who entered the scene before the arrival of the detective may have tampered with the collected evidence and this evidence was not reliable for trial. A similar scenario is observed in the possibility of planted blood traces found on the glove during the hearings. Oscar had submitted a blood sample to the police during an interrogation. Consequently, the capacity was not recorded, creating a room for doubt that some blood could have been sneak ed out of the laboratory into Brown’s home (Kaplan, 2009). Moreover, detective Lange covered Nicole’s body with one of her blankets to protect it from photographers. By failing to use a new unused sheet, the possibility that a transfer could have occurred became inevitable. Though no foreign material was found on her, whether the blanket picked up her attacker’s prints will remain a mere speculation, for that cannot be sufficiently proven. Another weakness found in evidence handling in

Existence Precedes Essence Essay

Existence Precedes Essence Essay Existence Precedes Essence According to metaphysics, essence precedes existence. This means that any object, if it has to come into existence its idea should exist in the mind of the creator. For example, if we want to build a house, an idea of how the house will look like, its features and location must take place in our mind; its essence should be there before it can come into existence. However Jean Paul Sartre implies that existence precedes essence in human beings. Sartre believes that the self or body or in other words, the existence comes into being first and then after the human being has entered this world; he defines or makes up his essence or nature by his interaction with the surroundings, people and opportunities around him. According to Sartre, every human being is defined or made essentially by development of his character through his time and interaction with the world and its people. Sartre also argues that because each human being is free to interact and make their own choices, the onus of these choices comes in the form of radical freedom and responsibility. Every human being is responsible for their own actions and its consequences through the decisions that have been made by him. Behavior, whether good or bad cannot be justified by making it a part of a human beings nature or essence (Cline, n.d). People make their own choices and decisions and act accordingly and therefore any results that their actions might bear are the sole responsibility of the qualities that have been developed by that person. According to Sartre, the proverb, as you sow, so shall you reap; defines his main idea of existentialism The implication for this comes to the fact that individually we are responsible for our own actions but collectively as a mankind our actions shape the world around us and the future generations will learn from these and shape their characters or nature. Friedrich Nietzsche also believed that people can only be truly free when they free themselves from religion and faith in God. His famous remark ‘God is dead echoes this ideology. The Christian church preached that all human beings were equal and that the after world was essentially of more importance than the present world, this according to Nietzsche undermined a human beings ability to excel and placed him in the same line as a common individual. He was highly influenced by Darwins theory survival of the fittest and believed that this kind of preaching undermined human beings true potential. According to Nietzsche anything that gave power to man and the will to power to deliver those actions was good and any form of weakness which according to him came by being moral and faithful was bad. In this case, since Christianity instilled in its believers moral values and the spiritual way of living, Nietzsche declared that the only way to achieve true potential and endure pain in t he real world and truly live life was to detach from God (Crowell, 2004) Abraham Maslows hierarchy of needs which consists of five levels namely physiological, safety, belonging, esteem and self actualization which is also the highest level of needs a person can achieve (cited in Burger, n.d). This relates to Sartres thesis that human beings exist and then define themselves by developing their nature and interacting with their surroundings. Maslow is essentially saying the same thing that a person who exists in this world moves towards fulfillment of his personal goals through decisions at varying levels of what he needs from the society in terms of food, shelter and a place among friends and family which helps him achieve the last stage of fulfillment of self actualization where he is able to give back to the society in terms of his experiences and the knowledge and development of ethics and character that has led him to lead a successful life essentially and give back to mankind. References Burger, D. (n.d.).Phenomenological perspectives on change. Retrieved March 22nd, 2010 from http://www.themanager.org/Strategy/Phenomenological_Perspectives_on_Change_-_Daniel_Burger.pdf Cline, A. (n.d.).Existence precedes essence: themes and ideas in existentialist thought. Retrieved March 22nd, 2010 from http://atheism.about.com/od/existentialistthemes/a/existence.htm Crowell, S. (2004). Existentialism.Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved (2010, March 22) from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/existentialism/

My Dad and the Flat Earth :: Personal Narrative Profile

My Dad and the Flat Earth Today my father tells us the earth is flat. He sits us down, the five of us, sits us down on the couch in the living room and tells us the earth is flat. It's not like he says, "Boys. The earth is flat," and then walks away. It's not like that at all. What he does is he takes the time to explain it to us. Even gives us visual aids. His hands become the earth. With his hands out before us he shows us the exact shape of the earth. It's not flat, really, but saucer shaped. Almost bowl shaped. He shows us with his hands. His fingers bend up slightly and his thumbs bend in towards each other, so that his hands make a kind of bowl. "Where do we live?" my oldest brother Sam asks. "Here," says my father. "in the bowl." "Really?" "Yeah," he says, with total confidence. "Look." He starts pulling his slightly cupped hands upward towards the ceiling, slowly. He doesn't say anything as he performs this move. He wants us to watch it for a while. He doesn't look at his hands, he looks at us. Our reaction. We don't react. "This is how the earth moves," he says. "it travels constantly upwards." "Upward?" says Len, my other older brother. "Yes. Upward." "Towards what?" It's me asking this time. I figure it's my turn to speak. My father looks at me for a moment and I think he's angry. I'm sorry I asked the question. Then this weird smile comes across his face and I'm not sorry anymore. Now I'm nervous. About my father. The thought occurs to me that my father has lost his mind and that this strange half-smile is the half-smile of a madman. "That's a very good question, Rand." "It is?" "A very good question. It shows you're using your mind." "Losing my mind? Why?" "Using," she says. "Oh. Using." "The earth travels upwards but it's not important where." "It isn't?" I was confused. He had just said that it was a good question, now he seemed to be saying it wasn't. "No," he answers. "What is important is what the earth moves in relation to.